Read This without Delay!

November 24, 2009 by maryjblog

As most of you know, I’m a little backed up this month because of my other writing project, National Novel Writing Month or NaNoWriMo. I may not complete the NaNo goal of 50,000 words by 11/30, but I’m plugging away during this, my week off, and my brother Ocean Fish will be glad to know that somebody has already called my protagonist and asked “Where’s Cheryl?”

Anyway, in the meanwhile, the enclosed is some of the most amusing microfiction I’ve read in ages. I couldn’t possibly imagine doing better myself, so go ahead, enjoy (you’ll have to cut & paste, as I can’t seem to get the link thingie to work):

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2009/11/30/091130sh_shouts_sacks

Who Wants to be a MJBillionaire?

November 21, 2009 by maryjblog

Yesterday I went into Manhattan to watch a taping (actually 3 tapings) of “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” and while I was there, took the contestant’s audition test. Although I didn’t think the test was very hard, I regret to say that I did not make the cut – out of about 150 people who took the test (general knowledge, multiple choice, 30 questions in 10 minutes,) only 6 were told that they passed, and I don’t know how many correct answers that entailed. The woman sitting next to me (the thing about these shows is everybody, for the most part, is in a jovial mood and very friendly. This lady decided – I’m not exactly sure how – that I was very smart and had surely gotten a passing score) had a theory that they don’t necessarily choose the highest scores b/c then ABC would have to give away too much money, which is interesting, but it conflicts with the fact that, as we all know, David Mackey who graduated from our h.s, was a contestant, and I’m willing to bet Dave got the highest score they ever saw.

Anyway, it was still a days’ worth of free entertainment, and I’d even consider trying again, if one of you would come with me. Here is what I have learned about the proceedings:

1. They send out more “reservations” than they actually have seats available, so you need to get there early, but not too early. I arrived at about 9:30, for a 10:15 “seating,” which was fine but I would’ve been out of luck if I’d arrived much later. The 10:15 seating means that the show begins taping @ 12:30 and is done by 3 – 3:30.
Once you show up and tell the young production assistant your name, she checks her clipboard, gives you a pink ticket w/a number on it, and tells you to come back @ 10:15. There is a nice Starbucks less than a block away so there’s no problem killing time, and if you forgot to bring a paper, there’s also a Barnes & Noble right near the subway stop. Once you get there @ 10:15, all the folks with pink tickets are herded into a line, where they give you an application to fill out, and eventually start admitting people into the building, a few at a time. The whole process takes maybe another 45-60 minutes, during which you stand outside on the sidewalk – it is a perfectly nice neighboorhood, on a block that appears to be owned almost entirely by ABC, but if you haven’t had breakfast bring your coffee w/you, as there are no pushcarts and nowhere inside the studio to get food. I recommend bringing a snack in your purse.

2. You have to go through security and get your bag checked, but it’s not a very stringent process - nothing like going to court.
I forgot to take my Swiss Army Knife out of my purse, and the nice guard waved me through without even noticing.

3. Wear layers, as the studio is really chilly, although not as frigid as when we went to the Letterman show. The “reservation” sez “you will be on national television, so dress to impress,” but people wear any damn thing.

4. Although when you are watching at home, “your host” is Meredith Viera, Meredith is essentially an actress who comes out at the last possible moment and reads from a teleprompter (quite effectively, I might add. She seems like a woman who knows this is a pretty sweet gig, and does her best to take it seriously.) The person actually in charge of wrangling the audience, once you are seated, is a third-rate “warm-up” comedian whose jokes aren’t all that funny, but who does have a very good understanding of maintaining a high energy level in the room, in a “let’s get this party started” kind of way – sort of like a dj at a bar mitzvah, but more off-color.

5. I am pleased to report that Meredith has not had a lot of cosmetic surgery, and is still sporting the face God gave her. She is as thin as a person can be and still look normal. They do a lot w/hair and lighting: her hair is absolutely perfect, in a simple, casual, sort of looks-like-she-does-it-herself-except-you know-it-took-a-stylist-hours-to-get-it-that-way-sort-of-style. From maybe 20 feet away, under the lights, you’d think she was my age or younger, even, but up close she looks like a very pretty Older Woman, with the natural lines of movement around her eyes and mouth intact. Her eyes are an intense, sparkling blue color that cannot be faked.

5. They don’t have the “life lines” anymore! Apparently with the widespread availability of Google, the people at home were looking up the answers, so now if a contestant wants help, s/he has the choice of asking the audience, which is great fun because you get to press this little keypad and vote in real time – or “asking the expert,” (who is a news correspondent from “ABC Weekend” and seems like a very bright guy. He is available by Skype, and does his best to give decent advice – I didn’t get the sense he was faking knowledge he didn’t have, and I think his proposed answers were correct all but one time. BTW my record in “ask the audience” was just as good, but I’m not bitter or anything,) or “double dipping”, which means s/he is allowed to choose 2 of the possible four answers.

Everybody won at least some money – the first few questions are really easy, as you know if you have watched the show, and I think any one of us could get at least as far as the $5,000 round -so if chosen, why wouldn’t you? After that, it’s sort of a crap shoot – the questions are not “Jeopardy” hard, but some of them are sort of obscure. Yesterday the biggest prize – $100K – went to a Protestant clergyman who said he intends to give most of the money to his church – how could you not root for him? Anyway that was my foray into American popular culture for the day. As I said, keep an eye on the website, and if any of yuz wants to go the next time they are taping (I think after next week, they’re done for a few months,) let me know. I think Rosie and I should go with the Baby Genius next year after she turns 18.

Getting it Done!

November 5, 2009 by maryjblog

As a reminder that the MJBlog is not just about literary geekdom, or show tunes, or hometown gossip, or drinking coffee, allow me to present another excellent example of our REAL theme: people who get off their asses and make the effort when it counts! Here is my second favorite athlete this week, Hideki Matsui of the 2009 World Champion New York Yankees, reminding the second-place team why Philadelphia is a city, but New York is the city. And no, the fact that he gave his post-game interview in Japanese, through an interpreter, does not make him any less of a New Yorker. Around here anybody who can produce those kind of results is one of us!

p.s. happy birthday from across the universe, Daddy!

Marathon Man!

November 3, 2009 by maryjblog

I offered Fang a guest spot on the blog today, but he is too shy so I will have to reprise my role as Designated Family Braggart, in order to share the news that my husband completed the New York City Marathon yesterday. Struggling against a bum knee and an achy ankle, he didn’t break any records (his official time was just over 6 1/2 hours,) but considering that at this time last year, he was still recovering from that surgery to remove something dear to him, I, for one, think running 26.2 miles is quite an achievement.

Hell, it’s exhausting to get around all 5 boros in one day by ANY means of transport!

The right knee started bothering him around mile 14, and he says that although he will be forever grateful to the anonymous EMT who wrapped it for him, the time that it took to ice it and wrap it almost did him in – he looked around the medical tent at the poor injured souls who had come so far, and struggled so bravely, but just did not have the strength on this one particular day, and told the guy “please wrap this up fast, before I want to quit.” He carried on, checking in w/me by disposable cell phone every few miles, and I caught up w/him on 73rd street in Manhattan, just outside the Dakota, sporting a spiffy finisher’s medal, looking sweaty and spent and a little gimpy and as handsome as I have ever seen him.

Congratulations to my beloved, and to all the other runners, of every age, gender and nationality, who had the will to get up off their asses and make the effort.

BOO!

October 31, 2009 by maryjblog

Happy Halloween, everybody! what are you handing out this year? I’ve got fun-sized bags of M & Ms, little Nestle’s chocolate bars & 100 Grand Bars, and wee bags of pretzels shaped like bats & pumpkins. Not much of a turnout yet – it’s early so I’ve only seen a handful of very little kids.

Hey McC – will you be in the parade this year? Send photos.

More Words to Live By

October 30, 2009 by maryjblog

As some of you know, this week my students did their mid-semester self-review exercise, in which they review their work to date, and write me a memo assessing their strengths & weaknesses, proposing concrete suggestions for improving their skills, and telling me what they’ve learned about the diff between college writing and high school writing. The answers vary widely; some are simply a whine bar, but others can be adorable or truly illuminating. The following was my favorite, by far:

“First of all I learned that I cannot b.s. a paper and expect to get away with it.”

This student is not a great writer – yet – but with an attitude like this, he is welcome at any class I ever teach. I told him that this single realization is worth the cost of a semester’s tuition, and reflects the thinking of a person who is ready to benefit from whatever college has to offer.

Whaddaya Make of This?

October 20, 2009 by maryjblog

Yesterday I did similar lessons in both my 100R (reluctant readers) and 201 (Research in Disciplines, also known as Law & Order in the Media) classes – I decided that instead of yammering on & on, in the abstract, about what I expect and what they should do, blah, blah, blah, etc., I would actually show them some examples of excellent student work. ( I mean, I can only get so far with advice about how I would have written a paper at their age – as Riff tells the adults in “West Side Story,” “you was never my age.”) In 100R, I took an excerpt from a paper that had gotten an A last year (fortunately, the student who wrote it is a repeat customer, who is now taking my 201 class, and she was nice enough to share one of her excellent papers w/me.) Anyway I took this very nicely written passage and kind of vandalized it: I left the content intact, but hacked up all of her nice, smooth, complex sentences into choppy, boring simple sentences, monotonously constructed, with no transitional language to speak of. As hard as I tried, I couldn’t make the thing any worse than maybe a weak C+, but that’s about the level at which many of them are working right now, so it was perfect. I handed out copies of the vandalized choppy passage, and asked everybdy to read it and make suggestions re: how they would improve it. Everyone agreed that it was passing work, but nobody said that it was just perfect and they wouldn’t change a thing. Many productive and constructive suggestions where passed around re: how we could make this text more beautiful, without changing the perfectly adequate content.

THEN I handed out the passage as it had actually been written, and explained that this is the kind of work that I got from an A student, in this very class, last year – I invited them to admire what a nice job she did, how many things she’d done right to get to this point, and launched into a little motivational speech about how the single thing that all my A students have in common is that they WANT that A, really badly: badly enough to acknowledge their own weaknesses, and do the revisions, and make the effort, and put in the time. My favorite moment in the motivational speech came when I told them that this particular paper came from probably the second best writer in 100R last year: I explained that the best writer, whose work was even a little more amazing, had the same drive as this author, but was working with a different set of challenges, as English is neither his first, nor his second, language (you’re probably all tired of hearing about Carlos, my Brazilian wunderkind.) It was a scream to watch them absorb this information: all the ESL students sat up a little straighter, taking some kind of vicarious pride in the excellence of a guy they’d never met, while all the complacent white American-born kids looked a little uneasy, as though somebody was gaining on them. Anyway, the lesson was well-received; everyone remained alert and engaged, and a number of shy kids stuck around after class to ask questions. If I’m any judge, a good time was had by all, in both sections.

201 was a little different. In that class, I distributed the entire text of one of my favorite research papers to date – a well-researched, fun-to-read little analysis of the vigilante myth, starting with the legend of Robin Hood and then focussing on Robin’s connections to a series of graphic novels about the superhero Green Arrow. It’s the sort of paper which proves that you can do excellent work while having an exuberantly good time w/your topic, and that’s the reason I hand it out as an example: the pages fairly sparkle with the joy that the student-author took in his work. I gave everybody time to skim it, and then went through the whole thing, pretty much one page at a time, explaining what I liked about the sources he chose, the way he set up his framework, and the way he used both primary sources and scholarly sources as a foundation for his own ideas. I showed them how he acknowledged the weaker, thinner, more obvious arguments, but didn’t rely on them for his whole thesis, and also how he had the stones to quote authors whose ideas disagreed with his own. I pointed out that even though the paper got an A, it’s not perfect – it’s just that the good qualities so outweigh the flaws that not only yours truly, but my supervisor agreed that this is what we look for in a A paper.

Anyway, this exercise was met, not with the enthusiasm I saw in 100R, but sort of a polite tolerance, mixed with just a touch of “oh christ, we have to do ALL that?!” This is a group of perfectly respectable students – all kids who passed 101, only a couple of whom are proving to be loafers or grade grubbers, but I didn’t see anybody sit up and welcome the challenge.

Now you blogsters were excellent students, and are all excellent writers – much more like the students whose work I would use as an example, than the ones who might find it intimidating. Do you have any guesses re: what accounts for the different responses? Do you think the upperclassmen are just more jaded than the freshmen, or are they smart enough to understand how hard the work is, or have they gotten busier and are afraid of a project that’s gonna take up so much of their time? The Department of Youth is invited to this discussion -please welcome the young scholars in your families to weigh in.

And Another Thing -

October 1, 2009 by maryjblog

I think you all know how I feel about Roman Polanski, but the militant fat feminist blogger Kate Harding has basically written down everything I was thinking, with exquisitely blunt eloquence – check it out:

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/28/polanski_arrest/index.html

Kate doesn’t have a bullshit bone in her body.

What Would You Do?

October 1, 2009 by maryjblog

This is not a question of ethics, just practicality. I misplaced my I-pod in a big way. I couldn’t find the damn thing for almost a month, which was distressing to me not because of the expense or even the trouble it would take to download all those songs again (plus I was looking forward to putting together my Xmas playlist in the next month or 2,) but because it was a gift from Fang and I’d grown attached to it. I probably should have done what my mother always recommends – say a prayer to St. Anthony, the patron saint of lost stuff – but I hate to bother a saint over something so trivial, even though Grandma Blog sez it’s OK and that she does it all the time with a remarkable rate of success. Anyway, I left poor St. Anthony in peace and searched everywhere – all my purses & luggage, both houses and both cars. When it didn’t turn up at the Lodge in the Hills this weekend, I finally gave up and bought a new one @ Target yesterday, in a vivid shade of metallic purple, just like the bike w/the banana seat that I rode as a kid.

Of course you know I found the old one w/in 24 hours of my purchase.

So now I am trying to decide whether to return the purple one or keep it as a backup. On the pro side, it’s nice to have a spare, the color (which was not available when I received the old one) is fantastic, and I could either have one for the house & one for the car/purse, OR one for NJ and one for NY. I could even use the new one for a theme – all showtunes, or all “classical,” or all Joni Mitchell. On the con side, it’s the most portable thing ever, the old one is only at about 75% of its storage capacity, I still have the sales slip (I’m famous for losing/misplacing/throwing them out; that’s one of the reasons I almost never return anything,) and the $160 I spent would come in handy, especially as the bathroom renovations continue (in a good way – no flooding or sanitary issues, I am glad to report, and the new floor, sink, and re-glazed tub look awesome, but some of those pipes are 70 years old and nothing lasts forever) and that $$ would pay for 2 nights at my new pied a terre, the Days Hotel on Rte. 18.

Let’s take a vote! If you were in my shoes, wouldja keep it, return it, or give it to Seth* ?

Should I keep the purple I-pod, or return it?(polls)

*Seth is a freshman in my Basic Comp class, who, upon hearing of this dilemma, suggested that I give the purple I-pod to the first student to get an A on a paper when I explained that I’m hoping more than one student will earn anA and that I can’t afford I-Pods for everyone, he responded “Just give it to me then; I won’t tell anybody.” Of course he’ll get nothing and like it, but I do admire his moxie.

It’s not the content:

September 18, 2009 by maryjblog

I don’t want you all to think this is going to turn into one of those stupid internet sites about News Bloopers. It’s just that, well, this might be the headline I’ve dreamed of since I learned how to read:

2009-09-17_ernie_anastos_.html

Take a look at the female co-anchor’s face: she should have been in silent films.